Best Content for llm in 2023

Track this topic after sign-in.

Query conditions: topic=llm, and publish_at in 2023

Top Picks

#9 · Paper · Sep 28, 2023

Qwen Technical Report

Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Luo Ji, Mei Li, Junyang Lin, Runji Lin, Dayiheng Liu, Gao Liu, Chengqiang Lu, Keming Lu, Jianxin Ma, Rui Men, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Chuanqi Tan, Sinan Tan, Jianhong Tu, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Wei Wang, Shengguang Wu, Benfeng Xu, Jin Xu, An Yang, Hao Yang, Jian Yang, Shusheng Yang, Yang Yao, Bowen Yu, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Jianwei Zhang, Xingxuan Zhang, Yichang Zhang, Zhenru Zhang, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, Xiaohuan Zhou, Tianhang Zhu · arxiv.org

#11 · Paper · Jun 13, 2023

PolyVoice: Language Models for Speech to Speech Translation

Qianqian Dong, Zhiying Huang, Qiao Tian, Chen Xu, Tom Ko, Yunlong Zhao, Siyuan Feng, Tang Li, Kexin Wang, Xuxin Cheng, Fengpeng Yue, Ye Bai, Xi Chen, Lu Lu, Zejun Ma, Yuping Wang, Mingxuan Wang, Yuxuan Wang · arxiv.org

#12 · Paper · May 25, 2023

Efficient Neural Music Generation

Max W. Y. Lam, Qiao Tian, Tang Li, Zongyu Yin, Siyuan Feng, Ming Tu, Yuliang Ji, Rui Xia, Mingbo Ma, Xuchen Song, Jitong Chen, Yuping Wang, Yuxuan Wang · arxiv.org

FAQ

How is this best llm content page ranked?

This page ranks llm content by topic match, content-type filter, checkout momentum, and freshness. The ranking is recalculated as new items and engagement signals arrive, so the top results stay practical for current workflows instead of remaining static or purely chronological.

What does the time scope in this URL mean?

The time suffix in this URL defines the publish-date window used for ranking. Year paths include items in that year, and YYYYMM paths include one calendar month. This makes comparisons cleaner when you want a focused snapshot rather than an all-time aggregate.

Is this list paid placement?

No. This ranking is editorial and signal-driven, not sponsored placement. Attendemia evaluates public metadata, source context, and usage momentum to rank candidates. Payment does not buy position, so readers can interpret the list as a curation surface rather than advertising inventory.