#1 · Paper · Dec 19, 2013
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Alex Graves, Ioannis Antonoglou, Daan Wierstra, Martin Riedmiller · arxiv.org
Best Papers for Machine Learning in 2013
Track this topic after sign-in.
Query conditions: topic=machine-learning, publish_at in 2013, and type=paper
Top Picks
#2 · Paper · Oct 16, 2013
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, Jeffrey Dean · arxiv.org
#3 · Paper · Oct 6, 2013
DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition
Jeff Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, Trevor Darrell · arxiv.org
#4 · Paper · Nov 28, 2013
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
Matthew D Zeiler, Rob Fergus · arxiv.org
#5 · Paper · Sep 20, 2013
Maxout Networks
Ian J. Goodfellow, David Warde-Farley, Mehdi Mirza, Aaron Courville, Yoshua Bengio · arxiv.org
#6 · Paper · Mar 22, 2013
Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, Geoffrey Hinton · arxiv.org
#7 · Paper · Sep 7, 2013
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, Jeffrey Dean · arxiv.org
FAQ
How is this best Machine Learning papers page ranked?
This page ranks Machine Learning papers by topic match, content-type filter, checkout momentum, and freshness. The ranking is recalculated as new items and engagement signals arrive, so the top results stay practical for current workflows instead of remaining static or purely chronological.
What does the time scope in this URL mean?
The time suffix in this URL defines the publish-date window used for ranking. Year paths include items in that year, and YYYYMM paths include one calendar month. This makes comparisons cleaner when you want a focused snapshot rather than an all-time aggregate.
Is this list paid placement?
No. This ranking is editorial and signal-driven, not sponsored placement. Attendemia evaluates public metadata, source context, and usage momentum to rank candidates. Payment does not buy position, so readers can interpret the list as a curation surface rather than advertising inventory.