Best Papers for Machine Learning in 2017

Track this topic after sign-in.

Query conditions: topic=machine-learning, publish_at in 2017, and type=paper

Top Picks

#2 · Paper · Jan 26, 2017

Wasserstein GAN

Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, Léon Bottou · arxiv.org

#8 · Paper · Mar 7, 2017

Deep Voice: Real-time Neural Text-to-Speech

Sercan O. Arik, Mike Chrzanowski, Adam Coates, Gregory Diamos, Andrew Gibiansky, Yongguo Kang, Xian Li, John Miller, Andrew Ng, Jonathan Raiman, Shubho Sengupta, Mohammad Shoeybi · arxiv.org

#11 · Paper · Oct 4, 2017

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, Jan Koutník, Bas R. Steunebrink, Jürgen Schmidhuber · arxiv.org

#16 · Paper · Apr 6, 2017

Tacotron: Towards End-to-End Speech Synthesis

Yuxuan Wang, RJ Skerry-Ryan, Daisy Stanton, Yonghui Wu, Ron J. Weiss, Navdeep Jaitly, Zongheng Yang, Ying Xiao, Zhifeng Chen, Samy Bengio, Quoc Le, Yannis Agiomyrgiannakis, Rob Clark, Rif A. Saurous · arxiv.org

#27 · Paper · Jun 12, 2017

Attention Is All You Need

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, Illia Polosukhin · arXiv

FAQ

How is this best Machine Learning papers page ranked?

This page ranks Machine Learning papers by topic match, content-type filter, checkout momentum, and freshness. The ranking is recalculated as new items and engagement signals arrive, so the top results stay practical for current workflows instead of remaining static or purely chronological.

What does the time scope in this URL mean?

The time suffix in this URL defines the publish-date window used for ranking. Year paths include items in that year, and YYYYMM paths include one calendar month. This makes comparisons cleaner when you want a focused snapshot rather than an all-time aggregate.

Is this list paid placement?

No. This ranking is editorial and signal-driven, not sponsored placement. Attendemia evaluates public metadata, source context, and usage momentum to rank candidates. Payment does not buy position, so readers can interpret the list as a curation surface rather than advertising inventory.